3/30/2016
The Lay of the Land
By Lyn Messersmith
Killing the Messenger
My spouse and I don’t always agree on what radio station or TV channel to listen to, but it’s no big deal. When I turn the ignition in the pickup that he usually drives and Limbaugh blasts, I just turn it off. I don’t turn on NPR when Bruce rides with me.
I agree with some things Rush proposes, many in fact, but his delivery and manner irritate me. When Mara Liasson is part of a panel on FOX News, Bruce generally supports her view, but he objects to the liberal slant that often comes through on public radio. Now mind you, I would sit through a Limbaugh rant for his sake, and simply think of something else. He’d do the same if I turned on All Things Considered on our way to town. We just choose to respect one another by limiting exposure to irritants.
That being said, it never hurts to scout out the opposite camp. An open mind can work wonders. We’ve been watching the political debates, and were happily surprised to discover that the moderators on a channel we generally avoid were fair and respectful, while those on the network we watch more frequently were snarky, and made numerous attempts to set candidates against one another.
The Constitution allows us freedom to express views that are unpopular, but more and more Americans seem unwilling to tolerate dissenting opinions. Universities create “safe spaces” where students who get their feelings hurt can go to whine. A free speech zone is set up in some public square so people can rant, supposedly without being harassed. Wait a minute—a free speech zone in a country where the first amendment guarantees the right to speak out?
There’s no end to the process of appeals in judicial matters. It reminds me of a kid who pleads, begs, and throws tantrums until the parent gives in out of sheer weariness. We have marches, protests, and standoffs by the dozen, most of which turn into riots where police are paralyzed at best, and injured at worst, where property is destroyed and the economy damaged.
The process of choosing a leader for our country has become a circus; a competition among clowns, and I’m not just speaking of those running for office. But when you give citizens the right to speak, that sometimes happens. I’m no cheerleader for Donald Trump, but the protesters who disrupt his rallies ought to be ashamed. Claiming free speech as justification for shutting down free speech is ridiculous.
I’ve thought considerably about this, and concluded that fear is the only winner in this fight. Some of us are afraid that Mr. Trump’s rhetoric will continue to fuel the anger that is rampant among the citizenry; others fear that his supporters lack the ability to differentiate between promises and policy. Not to mention many in government who fear an upset in the power structure. That would include a Justice Department that is considering prosecution for “climate change deniers.”
My own fear is based in knowing these people have the right to vote. And that they will.